[kata-dev] *Confidential: RE: Community use cases meeting (Confidential Computing)
Samuel Ortiz
sameo at linux.intel.com
Mon May 17 12:36:45 UTC 2021
Hey James,
I think we could yes. Would 2h later work for Mike? It'd be 7am PST, so
still early but more on the reasonable side?
Cheers,
Samuel.
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 06:22:13PM +0000, James Magowan wrote:
> Hi Samuel,
>
> I have spoken to Mike from containerd, He indicated that our Use Case
> meeting time is a bit early for many of the people working in containerd
> who might be interested.
>
> I wonder if we can have the meeting a little later next week to
> accomodate?
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
>
>
>
>
>
> James Magowan
>
>
>
>
> IBM United Kingdom Limited
> Registered in England and Wales with number 741598
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 3AU
>
>
>
>
> From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo at linux.intel.com>
> To: James Magowan <MAGOWAN at uk.ibm.com>
> Cc: Ariel Adam <aadam at redhat.com>, Peng Tao <bergwolf at antfin.com>,
> kata-dev <kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io>
> Date: 12/05/2021 13:22
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [kata-dev] Community use cases meeting
> (Confidential Computing)
>
>
>
> Hi James,
>
> Do you confirm you'll be able to present tomorrow during our weekly
> meeting? If so I'll add you (or someone else on your side) to the
> agenda. Thanks in advance.
>
> Cheers,
> Samuel.
>
> On Sat, May 01, 2021 at 04:07:18PM +0000, James Magowan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I mentioned at next meeting presenting the work and ideas which we have
> > been trying out for s390x around the image pull challenges and future
> > ideas.
> > With holidays in China for our main presenter and KubeCon next week I
> hope
> > it will be OK for us to present this and some ideas for possible
> > extensions to shim api etc the following week?
> > So Thursday 13th May.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > James Magowan
> > IBM Hyper Protect Containers (ZaaS Kubernetes)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Mobile: 44-7808-247946 | Phone: 44-1962-817235
> > E-mail: MAGOWAN at uk.ibm.com
> > Hursley Park
> > Hursley, Hampshire SO212JN
> > United Kingdom
> >
> >
> > IBM United Kingdom Limited
> > Registered in England and Wales with number 741598
> > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 3AU
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo at linux.intel.com>
> > To: Ariel Adam <aadam at redhat.com>, kata-dev
> > <kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io>
> > Cc: Peng Tao <bergwolf at antfin.com>
> > Date: 29/04/2021 15:41
> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [kata-dev] Community use cases meeting
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks everyone for joining today's meeting, very interesting
> > discussions.
> >
> > Please note that we decided to move to a weekly cadence, we have a lot
> > to talk about it seems.
> >
> > Below you will find the meeting minutes, extracted from the rolling
> > meeting notes document [1]
> >
> > * Current set of pull requests related to enablement (3 PRs)
> > - How do we want to proceed with those PRs?
> > - Samuel thinks that merging the TDX could help overall (a few more
> > comments to request). The idea would be to rebase the 2 others on
> top
> > of
> > this one. Any objections?
> > - We agree to merge the framework first and pile the other patches on
> > top
> > of it :-)
> >
> > * Agent API - discussion on what API restrictions we need (build time
> > option or not)
> > - What is the risk of having this code in the image however just not
> > used?
> > - It could be a runtime configuration for the agent however still part
>
> > of
> > the image (inside the initrd)
> > - We may have benefits from restricting the APIs (reducing attack
> > surface)
> > - Could we limit things to always getting all the pod configuration at
> > once (and nothing else?)
> > - So the idea would be to drop those APIs for all use cases
> >
> > * Container image service offload
> > - PEV raksh codebase ->
> >
> https://github.com/IBM/raksh-agent/commit/14b52fae8c7bc3ce4b226703efdb37749ce84fe9
>
> >
> >
> > * Testing for confidential computing - and general expectations
> > - A big question regarding how to test the different platform so it’s
> > something accessible upstream (SEV and TDX)
> > - Intel will provide HW for testing as part of the kata CI
> > - Can AMD also provide HW for the kata CI?
> > - Sandeep pointed out they have the HW for this however the question
> is
> > how to make the HW available for kata CI testing
> > - What tests would we want to run in this case?
> > - Samuel will pull Salvador to look into this
> > - We may start by looking at the integration tests and later on E2E
> > integration with k8s
> >
> > * Action Items
> > - Ariel to change the name of the meeting to confidential computing
> > - Ariel to change the meeting cadence to a weekly one
> > - Samuel to send a doodle to poll for meeting time changes
> >
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1E3GLCzNgrcigUlgWAZYlgqNTdVwiMwCRTJ0QnJhLZGA/edit?usp=sharing
>
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 11:23:23PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> > > All,
> > >
> > > A friendly reminder that we will have our weekly use case meeting
> > > tomorrow (04/29) at 12:00 UTC. See you all tomorrow!
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Samuel.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 08:12:34PM +0300, Ariel Adam wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 2:25 PM James Magowan <MAGOWAN at uk.ibm.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Ariel/Samuel,
> > > > >
> > > > > Moving Confidential computing Use Case meeting is fine for me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Given recent fun with summer savings time and the dates/times in
> the
> > > > > thread.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can we clarify that meetings will be?
> > > > > every 2 weeks at 12:00 UTC
> > > > >
> >
> https://zoom.us/j/98038141932
>
> >
> > > > > next meetings Thursday 29th April, Thursday 13th May etc.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > I've moved the meeting 1 week forward to April the 29th and verified
>
> > that
> > > > the only invitee is kata-dev mailing list.
> > > >
> > > > The meeting will be at 12:00 UTC and happen every 2 weeks.
> > > > I will also make sure to send a reminder a day before the meeting
> > (every 2
> > > > weeks).
> > > >
> > > > Lastly, I'm reminding everyone that this time slot is mainly for the
> > > > confidential computing use case and the CI/CD and performance use
> > cases
> > > > will be discussed at other times.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > James
> > > > > *Mobile:* 44-7808-247946 | *Phone:* 44-1962-817235
> > > > >
> > > > > *E-mail:* *MAGOWAN at uk.ibm.com* <MAGOWAN at uk.ibm.com>
> > > > > Hursley Park
> > > > >
> > > > > Hursley, Hampshire SO212JN
> > > > >
> > > > > United Kingdom
> > > > >
> > > > > IBM United Kingdom Limited
> > > > >
> > > > > Registered in England and Wales with number 741598
> > > > >
> > > > > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants.
> PO6
> > 3AU
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Ariel Adam <aadam at redhat.com>
> > > > > To: Samuel Ortiz <sameo at linux.intel.com>, Eric Ernst <
> > > > > eric.g.ernst at gmail.com>, Peng Tao <bergwolf at antfin.com>, kata-dev
> <
> > > > > kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io>
> > > > > Date: 18/04/2021 18:42
> > > > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [kata-dev] Community use cases
> > meeting
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Since you're leading the confidential computing use case which we
> > agreed
> > > > > Thursday's time slot would be used for then to me that makes
> sense.
> > > > >
> > > > > Does anyone object to moving the meeting by 1 week (as usual every
> 2
> > weeks
> > > > > from there)?
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, a few people pointed out that they don't see the meeting or
> > still
> > > > > see it every 2 weeks instead of 1 week. We basically sent an
> invite
> > to the
> > > > > kata-dev for every 2 weeks so if anyone has a better idea on how
> to
> > do that
> > > > > please let us know :-).
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 8:32 PM Samuel Ortiz
> > <*sameo at linux.intel.com*
> > > > > <sameo at linux.intel.com>> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Ariel,
> > > > >
> > > > > Next week's meeting (04/21), I will be out of the office and won't
>
> > be
> > > > > able to attend the meeting. Would anyone object if we shift that
> one
> > to
> > > > > 04/28 instead ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Samuel.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 01:27:54PM +0300, Ariel Adam wrote:
> > > > > > Hi everyone.
> > > > > > Going back to this mail thread.
> > > > > > Talking with Samuel it will be hard for him to move the time
> slot
> > for the
> > > > > > confidential computing use case (currently on Thursday every 2
> > weeks 8AM
> > > > > > EST).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What we suggest is the following:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - *Confidential computing* - will keep the current timeslot,
> > please
> > > > > ping
> > > > > > Samuel directly if you would like to attend and this is a
> > problem for
> > > > > you
> > > > > > - *CI/CD use case* - in practice it's only RH and IBM cloud
> > thus we
> > > > > will
> > > > > > work mainly through mails (and ping me if you are also
> > interested in
> > > > > this)
> > > > > > - *Performance isolation* - Tao will work on a different time
>
> > slot to
> > > > > > fit people who would like to attend as well (such as Eric)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As pointed, we will ask to provide a status on the use cases
> > progress
> > > > > > during the AC meetings if time permits.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Comments are welcomed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 5:08 PM Eric Ernst
> > <*eric.g.ernst at gmail.com*
> > > > > <eric.g.ernst at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Makes sense to me, and I appreciate the change!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Eric
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Apr 7, 2021, at 6:26 AM, Ariel Adam <*aadam at redhat.com*
> > > > > <aadam at redhat.com>> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Given that Tao agrees this makes sense I checked with Samuel
> as
> > well.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What we suggest is that each use case leads (Ariel, Samuel,
> Tao)
> > will
> > > > > send
> > > > > > > a separate doodle poll for their use case.
> > > > > > > That way each of the use case teams can decide on a time that
> > fits the
> > > > > > > majority of participants and also on the cadence of the
> meetings
> > > > > (every 1
> > > > > > > or 2 weeks).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We will also propose to give a short update on the progress of
>
> > the
> > > > > > > different use cases on the weekly AC meeting (if time
> permits).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Let us know if anyone has any objections before we send out
> the
> > doodle
> > > > > > > polls.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 3:03 PM Peng Tao via kata-dev <
> > > > > > > *kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io*
> > <kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io>>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Thanks for bringing it to the list Fabiano! I am interested
> in
> > the
> > > > > > >> performance isolation use case and would love to see US folks
>
> > present
> > > > > > >> their thoughts and ideas too. So I am all for it to split the
>
> > use case
> > > > > > >> meeting and relocate to a time that works better for US
> folks.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Cheers,
> > > > > > >> Tao
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On 2021/4/7 16:26, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > > > > > >> > Yesterday, Apr 6th, during the Architecture Committee
> > meeting, we
> > > > > > >> > discussed the possibility of having the community use cases
>
> > meeting
> > > > > > >> > split, and I assigned myself the action item to create a
> > doodle and
> > > > > > >> > send an email.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Well, let me start saying that I may have failed in the
> > doodle
> > > > > thing,
> > > > > > >> > but I still am dropping the email with what I heard as a
> > feedback
> > > > > and
> > > > > > >> > what I would like to suggest.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > I got the feedback, from more than one person, that the
> time
> > for the
> > > > > > >> > community use cases meeting is not exactly optimal for
> > everyone, and
> > > > > > >> > that is right. For instance, it may be too early for folks
>
> > in some
> > > > > > >> > parts of the US, while it is still too late for folks in
> > Australia.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > With this in mind, I would like to ask whether there is the
>
> > interest
> > > > > > >> > to split the meeting, allowing then the involved parts to
> > talk to
> > > > > each
> > > > > > >> > other in a time that suits them best.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > So, this message is for everyone, but here I am explicitly
> > looking
> > > > > for
> > > > > > >> > feedback from folks interested in:
> > > > > > >> > * K8S CI/CD pipeline with kata containers
> > > > > > >> > - Here we have people interested from the US and
> > Australia, so
> > > > > maybe
> > > > > > >> > a late meeting in the US time zone would benefit the folks
> in
> > > > > > >> > Australia.
> > > > > > >> > * Performance isolation
> > > > > > >> > - Here we have people interested from the US and China,
> so
> > maybe
> > > > > a
> > > > > > >> > late meeting in the US time zone would benefit the folks in
>
> > China.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > If the parts involved in this have the interest to do so,
> let
> > me
> > > > > know
> > > > > > >> > and then I will try to organise a doodle, set an official
> > time, etc,
> > > > > > >> > etc, etc.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > We, as the community facilitating this communication, are
> > here to
> > > > > > >> > facilitate the communication in a way that it will be
> > beneficial for
> > > > > > >> > all the involved parts.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Best Regards,
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > >> Into something rich and strange.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > > > > >> kata-dev mailing list
> > > > > > >> *kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io*
> > <kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io>
> > > > > > >> *
> >
> http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev*
>
> >
> > > > > <
> >
> http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev
>
> > >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > kata-dev mailing list
> > > > > > > *kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io*
> > <kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io>
> > > > > > > *
> >
> http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev*
>
> >
> > > > > <
> >
> http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev
>
> > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > kata-dev mailing list
> > > > > > *kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io*
> > <kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io>
> > > > > > *
> >
> http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev*
>
> >
> > > > > <
> >
> http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev
>
> > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > kata-dev mailing list
> > > > > kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io
> > > > >
> >
> http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev
>
> >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Unless stated otherwise above:
> > > > > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
> > number
> > > > > 741598.
> > > > > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire
>
> > PO6 3AU
> > > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > kata-dev mailing list
> > > kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io
> > >
> >
> http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev
>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > kata-dev mailing list
> > kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io
> >
> http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Unless stated otherwise above:
> > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
>
> > 741598.
> > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
> 3AU
> >
>
>
>
>
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>
More information about the kata-dev
mailing list