Confidential Containers: Naming
Hey Everyone, Naming is hard, we all know it. And the time has come to pick a name for our future confidential containers GitHub repo/organization. With other usual suspects, we’ve come up with a list of names for that project. This is copied from the confidential containers meeting document[1]: • Concontainer(s) • Conficon • Confibox • Confidcon • con-con • Con-box • Qonfid • Confidential-containers • Blackbox • Blackhole • Skelduz Containers • Janjira Containers • Serrana Containers • Nesta Containers • Knox Containers In order to choose one name, I’m going to create a poll and let everyone vote in a few days. But before doing so I’d like to check if there are more proposals. So if you can think of any other name, please add it to [1]. Be creative :-) Cheer, Samuel. [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1E3GLCzNgrcigUlgWAZYlgqNTdVwiMwCRTJ0QnJhL...
conshed. ;) ________________________________________ From: Samuel Ortiz via kata-dev <kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 10:21 AM To: kata-dev Subject: [kata-dev] Confidential Containers: Naming Check twice before you click! This email originated from outside PNNL. Hey Everyone, Naming is hard, we all know it. And the time has come to pick a name for our future confidential containers GitHub repo/organization. With other usual suspects, we’ve come up with a list of names for that project. This is copied from the confidential containers meeting document[1]: • Concontainer(s) • Conficon • Confibox • Confidcon • con-con • Con-box • Qonfid • Confidential-containers • Blackbox • Blackhole • Skelduz Containers • Janjira Containers • Serrana Containers • Nesta Containers • Knox Containers In order to choose one name, I’m going to create a poll and let everyone vote in a few days. But before doing so I’d like to check if there are more proposals. So if you can think of any other name, please add it to [1]. Be creative :-) Cheer, Samuel. [1] https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.googl... _______________________________________________ kata-dev mailing list kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.katac...
* Samuel Ortiz via kata-dev (kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io) wrote:
Hey Everyone,
Naming is hard, we all know it. And the time has come to pick a name for our future confidential containers GitHub repo/organization. With other usual suspects, we’ve come up with a list of names for that project. This is copied from the confidential containers meeting document[1]:
• Concontainer(s) • Conficon • Confibox • Confidcon • con-con • Con-box • Qonfid • Confidential-containers • Blackbox • Blackhole • Skelduz Containers • Janjira Containers • Serrana Containers • Nesta Containers • Knox Containers
In order to choose one name, I’m going to create a poll and let everyone vote in a few days. But before doing so I’d like to check if there are more proposals. So if you can think of any other name, please add it to [1]. Be creative :-)
The Linux kernel is starting to use 'Coco' as an abbreviation for Confidential Computing. It's short and easy. ( 'cocon' is too close to cocoon that already exists. 'coconut' is already taken on github. ) Dave
Cheer, Samuel.
[1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1E3GLCzNgrcigUlgWAZYlgqNTdVwiMwCRTJ0QnJhL...
_______________________________________________ kata-dev mailing list kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 8:41 PM Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> wrote:
Hey Everyone,
Naming is hard, we all know it. And the time has come to pick a name for our future confidential containers GitHub repo/organization. With other usual suspects, we’ve come up with a list of names for that
* Samuel Ortiz via kata-dev (kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io) wrote: project. This is copied from the confidential containers meeting document[1]:
• Concontainer(s) • Conficon • Confibox • Confidcon • con-con • Con-box • Qonfid • Confidential-containers • Blackbox • Blackhole • Skelduz Containers • Janjira Containers • Serrana Containers • Nesta Containers • Knox Containers
In order to choose one name, I’m going to create a poll and let everyone
vote in a few days.
But before doing so I’d like to check if there are more proposals. So if you can think of any other name, please add it to [1]. Be creative :-)
The Linux kernel is starting to use 'Coco' as an abbreviation for Confidential Computing. It's short and easy.
Coco was actually our first pick however if you look at github you will see that Coco and anything that starts with Coco is taken :-). If anyone has an idea how to solve that then we can add some coco variant to the list as well. Thanks.
( 'cocon' is too close to cocoon that already exists. 'coconut' is already taken on github. )
Dave
Cheer, Samuel.
[1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1E3GLCzNgrcigUlgWAZYlgqNTdVwiMwCRTJ0QnJhL...
_______________________________________________ kata-dev mailing list kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
_______________________________________________ kata-dev mailing list kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev
Kata Containers + Coco == kcoco On 9/13/21 2:41 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
* Samuel Ortiz via kata-dev (kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io) wrote:
Hey Everyone,
Naming is hard, we all know it. And the time has come to pick a name for our future confidential containers GitHub repo/organization. With other usual suspects, we’ve come up with a list of names for that project. This is copied from the confidential containers meeting document[1]:
• Concontainer(s) • Conficon • Confibox • Confidcon • con-con • Con-box • Qonfid • Confidential-containers • Blackbox • Blackhole • Skelduz Containers • Janjira Containers • Serrana Containers • Nesta Containers • Knox Containers
In order to choose one name, I’m going to create a poll and let everyone vote in a few days. But before doing so I’d like to check if there are more proposals. So if you can think of any other name, please add it to [1]. Be creative :-) The Linux kernel is starting to use 'Coco' as an abbreviation for Confidential Computing. It's short and easy.
( 'cocon' is too close to cocoon that already exists. 'coconut' is already taken on github. )
Dave
Cheer, Samuel.
[1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1E3GLCzNgrcigUlgWAZYlgqNTdVwiMwCRTJ0QnJhL...
_______________________________________________ kata-dev mailing list kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev
September 14, 2021 3:59 PM, "Samuel Ortiz via kata-dev" <kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io> wrote:
On 14 Sep 2021, at 14:56, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta <wmoschet@redhat.com> wrote:
Kata Containers + Coco == kcoco
Good call…Unfortunately, coco, coko, koco and kcoco are all already reserved on GitHub.
not sure if this would make sense but adding some fuzziness might solve one issue: c0-c0 is available on github. However its still confusing 0/o, even with the dash it seems a bit far fetched... cheers, -T
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 3:00 PM Samuel Ortiz via kata-dev <kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io> wrote:
On 14 Sep 2021, at 14:56, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta <wmoschet@redhat.com> wrote:
Kata Containers + Coco == kcoco
Good call…Unfortunately, coco, coko, koco and kcoco are all already reserved on GitHub.
Why not just go ahead for the simple "https://github.com/confidential-containers"? People won't have to wonder about how it's spelled or what was that thing related to confidential-containers that happened to have a different name. Best Regards, -- Fabiano Fidêncio
Hi All Silly question, Why a new organization is needed? All these sub-projects/crates/libs will end up in the same place (kata repo) We already did something similar in the past with virtcontainers and it was a waste of time and resources! https://github.com/containers/virtcontainers https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/tree/main/src/runtime/vir... remember?? -- Julio On Tue, 2021-09-14 at 15:08 +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 3:00 PM Samuel Ortiz via kata-dev <kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io> wrote:
On 14 Sep 2021, at 14:56, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta < wmoschet@redhat.com> wrote:
Kata Containers + Coco == kcoco
Good call…Unfortunately, coco, coko, koco and kcoco are all already reserved on GitHub.
Why not just go ahead for the simple "https://github.com/confidential-containers"?
People won't have to wonder about how it's spelled or what was that thing related to confidential-containers that happened to have a different name.
Best Regards,
Maybe confidential-containers is not a sub-project of kata, instead is positioned as a new project making use of Kata? There will be more components in addition to current kata container components, such as cc-shim, aa agent, image service etc.
On Sep 14, 2021, at 9:32 PM, Montes, Julio <julio.montes@intel.com> wrote:
Hi All
Silly question, Why a new organization is needed?
All these sub-projects/crates/libs will end up in the same place (kata repo)
We already did something similar in the past with virtcontainers and it was a waste of time and resources!
https://github.com/containers/virtcontainers
https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/tree/main/src/runtime/vir...
remember??
-- Julio
On Tue, 2021-09-14 at 15:08 +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 3:00 PM Samuel Ortiz via kata-dev <kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io> wrote:
On 14 Sep 2021, at 14:56, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta < wmoschet@redhat.com> wrote:
Kata Containers + Coco == kcoco
Good call…Unfortunately, coco, coko, koco and kcoco are all already reserved on GitHub.
Why not just go ahead for the simple "https://github.com/confidential-containers"?
People won't have to wonder about how it's spelled or what was that thing related to confidential-containers that happened to have a different name.
Best Regards,
kata-dev mailing list kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev
On 14 Sep 2021, at 15:08, Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 3:00 PM Samuel Ortiz via kata-dev <kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io <mailto:kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io>> wrote:
On 14 Sep 2021, at 14:56, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta <wmoschet@redhat.com> wrote:
Kata Containers + Coco == kcoco
Good call…Unfortunately, coco, coko, koco and kcoco are all already reserved on GitHub.
Why not just go ahead for the simple "https://github.com/confidential-containers <https://github.com/confidential-containers>"?
+1. That's one of my proposals in the Google doc. The question is: what if we end up needing a special command-line tool? For example, I proposed kircc (recursive acronym for "kircc is really confidential containers").
People won't have to wonder about how it's spelled or what was that thing related to confidential-containers that happened to have a different name.
Best Regards, -- Fabiano Fidêncio
_______________________________________________ kata-dev mailing list kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io <mailto:kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io> http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev <http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev>
Hey Everyone,
In order to choose one name, I’m going to create a poll and let everyone vote in a few days.
Here is the Google form: https://forms.gle/5P2K5PktkbjogFtE6 <https://forms.gle/5P2K5PktkbjogFtE6> Go ahead and raise your voice, but please vote only once :) Cheers, Samuel.
On 15 Sep 2021, at 16:09, Samuel Ortiz <samuel.e.ortiz@protonmail.com> wrote:
Hey Everyone,
In order to choose one name, I’m going to create a poll and let everyone vote in a few days.
Here is the Google form: https://forms.gle/5P2K5PktkbjogFtE6 <https://forms.gle/5P2K5PktkbjogFtE6>
Go ahead and raise your voice, but please vote only once :)
Forgot to mention: This is a 24h poll, we’ll look at the results during tomorrow’s meeting. Cheers, Samuel.
On 15 Sep 2021, at 16:23, Samuel Ortiz via kata-dev <kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io> wrote:
On 15 Sep 2021, at 16:09, Samuel Ortiz <samuel.e.ortiz@protonmail.com> wrote:
Hey Everyone,
In order to choose one name, I’m going to create a poll and let everyone vote in a few days.
Here is the Google form: https://forms.gle/5P2K5PktkbjogFtE6 <https://forms.gle/5P2K5PktkbjogFtE6>
Go ahead and raise your voice, but please vote only once :)
Forgot to mention: This is a 24h poll, we’ll look at the results during tomorrow’s meeting.
Voting and counting in one day? Are you even watching the news ;-)
Cheers, Samuel.
_______________________________________________ kata-dev mailing list kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io <mailto:kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io> http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev <http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev>
participants (10)
-
ananos＠nubificus.co.uk
-
Ariel Adam
-
Christophe de Dinechin
-
Dr. David Alan Gilbert
-
Fabiano Fidêncio
-
Fox, Kevin M
-
Jiang Liu
-
Montes, Julio
-
Samuel Ortiz
-
Wainer dos Santos Moschetta