Open Stack

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 2:25 PM James Magowan <MAGOWAN at uk.ibm.com> wrote:

> Hi Ariel/Samuel,
>
> Moving Confidential computing Use Case meeting is fine for me.
>
> Given recent fun with summer savings time and the dates/times in the
> thread.
>
> Can we clarify that meetings will be?
> every 2 weeks at 12:00 UTC
> https://zoom.us/j/98038141932
> next meetings Thursday 29th April, Thursday 13th May etc.
>
>
I've moved the meeting 1 week forward to April the 29th and verified that
the only invitee is kata-dev mailing list.

The meeting will be at 12:00 UTC and happen every 2 weeks.
I will also make sure to send a reminder a day before the meeting (every 2
weeks).

Lastly, I'm reminding everyone that this time slot is mainly for the
confidential computing use case and the CI/CD and performance use cases
will be discussed at other times.

Thanks.


>
> Thanks,
>
> James
> *Mobile:* 44-7808-247946 | *Phone:* 44-1962-817235
>
> *E-mail:* *MAGOWAN at uk.ibm.com* <MAGOWAN at uk.ibm.com>
> Hursley Park
>
> Hursley, Hampshire SO212JN
>
> United Kingdom
>
> IBM United Kingdom Limited
>
> Registered in England and Wales with number 741598
>
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 3AU
>
>
>
>
>
> From:        Ariel Adam <aadam at redhat.com>
> To:        Samuel Ortiz <sameo at linux.intel.com>, Eric Ernst <
> eric.g.ernst at gmail.com>, Peng Tao <bergwolf at antfin.com>, kata-dev <
> kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io>
> Date:        18/04/2021 18:42
> Subject:        [EXTERNAL] Re: [kata-dev] Community use cases meeting
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Since you're leading the confidential computing use case which we agreed
> Thursday's time slot would be used for then to me that makes sense.
>
> Does anyone object to moving the meeting by 1 week (as usual every 2 weeks
> from there)?
>
> Also, a few people pointed out that they don't see the meeting or still
> see it every 2 weeks instead of 1 week. We basically sent an invite to the
> kata-dev for every 2 weeks so if anyone has a better idea on how to do that
> please let us know :-).
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 8:32 PM Samuel Ortiz <*sameo at linux.intel.com*
> <sameo at linux.intel.com>> wrote:
>
> Ariel,
>
> Next week's meeting (04/21), I will be out of the office and won't be
> able to attend the meeting. Would anyone object if we shift that one to
> 04/28 instead ?
>
> Cheers,
> Samuel.
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 01:27:54PM +0300, Ariel Adam wrote:
> > Hi everyone.
> > Going back to this mail thread.
> > Talking with Samuel it will be hard for him to move the time slot for the
> > confidential computing use case (currently on Thursday every 2 weeks 8AM
> > EST).
> >
> > What we suggest is the following:
> >
> >    - *Confidential computing* - will keep the current timeslot, please
> ping
> >    Samuel directly if you would like to attend and this is a problem for
> you
> >    - *CI/CD use case* - in practice it's only RH and IBM cloud thus we
> will
> >    work mainly through mails (and ping me if you are also interested in
> this)
> >    - *Performance isolation* - Tao will work on a different time slot to
> >    fit people who would like to attend as well (such as Eric)
> >
> > As pointed, we will ask to provide a status on the use cases progress
> > during the AC meetings if time permits.
> >
> > Comments are welcomed.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 5:08 PM Eric Ernst <*eric.g.ernst at gmail.com*
> <eric.g.ernst at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > > Makes sense to me, and I appreciate the change!
> > >
> > > Eric
> > >
> > > On Apr 7, 2021, at 6:26 AM, Ariel Adam <*aadam at redhat.com*
> <aadam at redhat.com>> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Given that Tao agrees this makes sense I checked with Samuel as well.
> > >
> > > What we suggest is that each use case leads (Ariel, Samuel, Tao) will
> send
> > > a separate doodle poll for their use case.
> > > That way each of the use case teams can decide on a time that fits the
> > > majority of participants and also on the cadence of the meetings
> (every 1
> > > or 2 weeks).
> > >
> > > We will also propose to give a short update on the progress of the
> > > different use cases on the weekly AC meeting (if time permits).
> > >
> > > Let us know if anyone has any objections before we send out the doodle
> > > polls.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 3:03 PM Peng Tao via kata-dev <
> > > *kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io* <kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io>>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Thanks for bringing it to the list Fabiano! I am interested in the
> > >> performance isolation use case and would love to see US folks present
> > >> their thoughts and ideas too. So I am all for it to split the use case
> > >> meeting and relocate to a time that works better for US folks.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Tao
> > >>
> > >> On 2021/4/7 16:26, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > >> > Yesterday, Apr 6th, during the Architecture Committee meeting, we
> > >> > discussed the possibility of having the community use cases meeting
> > >> > split, and I assigned myself the action item to create a doodle and
> > >> > send an email.
> > >> >
> > >> > Well, let me start saying that I may have failed in the doodle
> thing,
> > >> > but I still am dropping the email with what I heard as a feedback
> and
> > >> > what I would like to suggest.
> > >> >
> > >> > I got the feedback, from more than one person, that the time for the
> > >> > community use cases meeting is not exactly optimal for everyone, and
> > >> > that is right.  For instance, it may be too early for folks in some
> > >> > parts of the US, while it is still too late for folks in Australia.
> > >> >
> > >> > With this in mind, I would like to ask whether there is the interest
> > >> > to split the meeting, allowing then the involved parts to talk to
> each
> > >> > other in a time that suits them best.
> > >> >
> > >> > So, this message is for everyone, but here I am explicitly looking
> for
> > >> > feedback from folks interested in:
> > >> > * K8S CI/CD pipeline with kata containers
> > >> >    - Here we have people interested from the US and Australia, so
> maybe
> > >> > a late meeting in the US time zone would benefit the folks in
> > >> > Australia.
> > >> > * Performance isolation
> > >> >    - Here we have people interested from the US and China, so maybe
> a
> > >> > late meeting in the US time zone would benefit the folks in China.
> > >> >
> > >> > If the parts involved in this have the interest to do so, let me
> know
> > >> > and then I will try to organise a doodle, set an official time, etc,
> > >> > etc, etc.
> > >> >
> > >> > We, as the community facilitating this communication, are here to
> > >> > facilitate the communication in a way that it will be beneficial for
> > >> > all the involved parts.
> > >> >
> > >> > Best Regards,
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Into something rich and strange.
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> kata-dev mailing list
> > >> *kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io* <kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io>
> > >> *http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev*
> <http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev>
> > >>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > kata-dev mailing list
> > > *kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io* <kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io>
> > > *http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev*
> <http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev>
> > >
> > >
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > kata-dev mailing list
> > *kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io* <kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io>
> > *http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev*
> <http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev>
> _______________________________________________
> kata-dev mailing list
> kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io
> http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev
>
>
>
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.katacontainers.io/pipermail/kata-dev/attachments/20210419/fb7c5253/attachment-0001.html>