Open Stack

Hi Ariel/Samuel,

Moving Confidential computing Use Case meeting is fine for me.

Given recent fun with summer savings time and the dates/times in the 
thread.

Can we clarify that meetings will be?
every 2 weeks at 12:00 UTC
https://zoom.us/j/98038141932
next meetings Thursday 29th April, Thursday 13th May etc.


Thanks,

James


Mobile: 44-7808-247946 | Phone: 44-1962-817235
E-mail: MAGOWAN at uk.ibm.com
Hursley Park
Hursley, Hampshire SO212JN
United Kingdom


IBM United Kingdom Limited
Registered in England and Wales with number 741598
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 3AU




From:   Ariel Adam <aadam at redhat.com>
To:     Samuel Ortiz <sameo at linux.intel.com>, Eric Ernst 
<eric.g.ernst at gmail.com>, Peng Tao <bergwolf at antfin.com>, kata-dev 
<kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io>
Date:   18/04/2021 18:42
Subject:        [EXTERNAL] Re: [kata-dev] Community use cases meeting



Since you're leading the confidential computing use case which we agreed 
Thursday's time slot would be used for then to me that makes sense.

Does anyone object to moving the meeting by 1 week (as usual every 2 weeks 
from there)?

Also, a few people pointed out that they don't see the meeting or still 
see it every 2 weeks instead of 1 week. We basically sent an invite to the 
kata-dev for every 2 weeks so if anyone has a better idea on how to do 
that please let us know :-).

Thanks. 

On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 8:32 PM Samuel Ortiz <sameo at linux.intel.com> 
wrote:
Ariel,

Next week's meeting (04/21), I will be out of the office and won't be
able to attend the meeting. Would anyone object if we shift that one to
04/28 instead ?

Cheers,
Samuel.

On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 01:27:54PM +0300, Ariel Adam wrote:
> Hi everyone.
> Going back to this mail thread.
> Talking with Samuel it will be hard for him to move the time slot for 
the
> confidential computing use case (currently on Thursday every 2 weeks 8AM
> EST).
> 
> What we suggest is the following:
> 
>    - *Confidential computing* - will keep the current timeslot, please 
ping
>    Samuel directly if you would like to attend and this is a problem for 
you
>    - *CI/CD use case* - in practice it's only RH and IBM cloud thus we 
will
>    work mainly through mails (and ping me if you are also interested in 
this)
>    - *Performance isolation* - Tao will work on a different time slot to
>    fit people who would like to attend as well (such as Eric)
> 
> As pointed, we will ask to provide a status on the use cases progress
> during the AC meetings if time permits.
> 
> Comments are welcomed.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 5:08 PM Eric Ernst <eric.g.ernst at gmail.com> 
wrote:
> 
> > Makes sense to me, and I appreciate the change!
> >
> > Eric
> >
> > On Apr 7, 2021, at 6:26 AM, Ariel Adam <aadam at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > Given that Tao agrees this makes sense I checked with Samuel as well.
> >
> > What we suggest is that each use case leads (Ariel, Samuel, Tao) will 
send
> > a separate doodle poll for their use case.
> > That way each of the use case teams can decide on a time that fits the
> > majority of participants and also on the cadence of the meetings 
(every 1
> > or 2 weeks).
> >
> > We will also propose to give a short update on the progress of the
> > different use cases on the weekly AC meeting (if time permits).
> >
> > Let us know if anyone has any objections before we send out the doodle
> > polls.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 3:03 PM Peng Tao via kata-dev <
> > kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io> wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks for bringing it to the list Fabiano! I am interested in the
> >> performance isolation use case and would love to see US folks present
> >> their thoughts and ideas too. So I am all for it to split the use 
case
> >> meeting and relocate to a time that works better for US folks.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Tao
> >>
> >> On 2021/4/7 16:26, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> >> > Yesterday, Apr 6th, during the Architecture Committee meeting, we
> >> > discussed the possibility of having the community use cases meeting
> >> > split, and I assigned myself the action item to create a doodle and
> >> > send an email.
> >> >
> >> > Well, let me start saying that I may have failed in the doodle 
thing,
> >> > but I still am dropping the email with what I heard as a feedback 
and
> >> > what I would like to suggest.
> >> >
> >> > I got the feedback, from more than one person, that the time for 
the
> >> > community use cases meeting is not exactly optimal for everyone, 
and
> >> > that is right.  For instance, it may be too early for folks in some
> >> > parts of the US, while it is still too late for folks in Australia.
> >> >
> >> > With this in mind, I would like to ask whether there is the 
interest
> >> > to split the meeting, allowing then the involved parts to talk to 
each
> >> > other in a time that suits them best.
> >> >
> >> > So, this message is for everyone, but here I am explicitly looking 
for
> >> > feedback from folks interested in:
> >> > * K8S CI/CD pipeline with kata containers
> >> >    - Here we have people interested from the US and Australia, so 
maybe
> >> > a late meeting in the US time zone would benefit the folks in
> >> > Australia.
> >> > * Performance isolation
> >> >    - Here we have people interested from the US and China, so maybe 
a
> >> > late meeting in the US time zone would benefit the folks in China.
> >> >
> >> > If the parts involved in this have the interest to do so, let me 
know
> >> > and then I will try to organise a doodle, set an official time, 
etc,
> >> > etc, etc.
> >> >
> >> > We, as the community facilitating this communication, are here to
> >> > facilitate the communication in a way that it will be beneficial 
for
> >> > all the involved parts.
> >> >
> >> > Best Regards,
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> Into something rich and strange.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> kata-dev mailing list
> >> kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io
> >> http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > kata-dev mailing list
> > kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io
> > http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev
> >
> >

> _______________________________________________
> kata-dev mailing list
> kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io
> http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev
_______________________________________________
kata-dev mailing list
kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io
http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev 




Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.katacontainers.io/pipermail/kata-dev/attachments/20210419/a3105e63/attachment.html>