Open Stack

On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 13:01 -0700, Venegas Munoz, Jose Carlos wrote:
> One more thing
> 
> I think is better to take the patches to packaging instead of
> maintain the fork of qemu.
> 
> Can I ask you to send the patches that we have to packaging as we do
> with the kernel?
> 

Sure, I'll do

Thanks

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Montes, Julio [mailto:julio.montes at intel.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2019 3:41 PM
> To: kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io
> Subject: [kata-dev] Qemu 4
> 
> Folks,
> 
> Qemu 4 was released this week, is there a plan to start using this
> new version in kata containers?
> 
> In the meantime, I have created a new branch in kata-container/qemu
> [1] to test this new version + kata patches.
> 
> Only two patches were applied:
> 1. 9p optimizations.
> 2. vm-templating patch.
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> -
> Julio
> 
> 
> Notes:
> * Memory footprint looks better
> 
> [1] - https://github.com/kata-containers/qemu/tree/kata-qemu-4.0.0
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kata-dev mailing list
> kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io
> http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev