Hey Sasha, Anthony – I want to set a bit of context here. At the face to face discussion in Vancouver, we had agreed to share the prototyping we have put in place to better understand how far we could go to remove legacy, and minimize the number of device models, while still booting key workloads. Manohar’s response is to address the action that everyone in the meeting requested. Cheers, Eric On 6/6/18, 1:46 PM, "Sasha Levin" <Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com> wrote: On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 08:08:46PM +0000, Castelino, Manohar R wrote: >Folks, > >Please find below the link to the initial prototype code that tries to reduce the number of emulated devices in QEMU that can still boot most cloud workloads. [snip] Out of curiousity, have you looked at kvmtool (https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/will/kvmtool.git/)? Forking qemu rather than building on top of it (or using something else) isn't going to end well IMO. _______________________________________________ Kata-hypervisor mailing list Kata-hypervisor@lists.katacontainers.io http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-hypervisor