KSM user? - memory footprint regression
            
            
            
                17 Jul
                
                    2019
                
            
            
                17 Jul
                
                '19
                
            
            
            
        
    
                8:22 a.m.
            
        Hi Kata-folks I have raised a pull request to enable some security features in the guest kernel https://github.com/kata-containers/packaging/pull/639 . This change will impact in the memory consumption because of the kernel memory randomization. In the case of no-KSM the difference is ~2MB and I think it's a price that we can pay. But for KSM the difference is ~36MB. I would like to know what do you think about this change. Is KSM a feature that should be still considered? Do you have enabled KSM in your cluster? Thanks -- Julio
        2301
        
      
          Age (days ago)
        
      
        2301
        
    
          Last active (days ago)
        
        
        
        0 comments
    
    
        
        1 participants
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    participants (1)
- 
                
                Montes, Julio