On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 11:43:59AM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
[resend with cut quote, original was held in moderation for being > 40K]
On 31 Aug 2021, at 12:31, David Gibson kata-dev@gibson.dropbear.id.au wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 09:23:04AM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 5:16 AM David Gibson kata-dev@gibson.dropbear.id.au wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 01:24:20PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
David,
Then we will have an one not small patch removing the govmm vendor.
So, I'd be happy enough with this approach if we could incrementally introduce the new interface then drop govmm once the new interface covers everything.
Unfortunately, that doesn't really work, because govmm owns the qmp interface and the qemu command line, so we can't build a new interface "bottom up".
While we are at it, should we rename "govmm" to something that indicates it's really specific to qemu?
Fwiw, my draft PR simply calls it the "qemu" package in the imported copy.
Or do we want to take the opposite route (which was evoked yesterday) to move to VMM the "hypervisor" abstraction that we have in Kata?
I'm not really sure what you're suggesting here.