* Montes, Julio (julio.montes@intel.com) wrote:
Hi kata-folks
One of the topics in today's agent was QEMU 4 and the work that we are doing to support it in Kata Containers. I ran the boot time and memory footprint metrics in my workstation to compare QEMU 4 vs QEMU-lite (2.11). Here the results.
Feel free to comment and raise your concerns about QEMU 4.
So that looks pretty nice for QEMU 4; at least as fast and in the noise on the memory usage? Do you have any notes on how you configured and built the qemu 4 ? Dave
[cid:0167e7dca7f28c0cac1fcbc4b25a97cfeec1de1a.camel@intel.com]
[cid:78029be0c3d799ae75a605b679187f4b84a38ae2.camel@intel.com]
_______________________________________________ kata-dev mailing list kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev
-- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK