Open Stack

Makes sense to me, and I appreciate the change!

Eric 

> On Apr 7, 2021, at 6:26 AM, Ariel Adam <aadam at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Given that Tao agrees this makes sense I checked with Samuel as well.
> 
> What we suggest is that each use case leads (Ariel, Samuel, Tao) will send a separate doodle poll for their use case.
> That way each of the use case teams can decide on a time that fits the majority of participants and also on the cadence of the meetings (every 1 or 2 weeks).
> 
> We will also propose to give a short update on the progress of the different use cases on the weekly AC meeting (if time permits).
> 
> Let us know if anyone has any objections before we send out the doodle polls.
> 
> Thanks. 
> 
> 
>> On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 3:03 PM Peng Tao via kata-dev <kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io> wrote:
>> Thanks for bringing it to the list Fabiano! I am interested in the 
>> performance isolation use case and would love to see US folks present 
>> their thoughts and ideas too. So I am all for it to split the use case 
>> meeting and relocate to a time that works better for US folks.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Tao
>> 
>> On 2021/4/7 16:26, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>> > Yesterday, Apr 6th, during the Architecture Committee meeting, we
>> > discussed the possibility of having the community use cases meeting
>> > split, and I assigned myself the action item to create a doodle and
>> > send an email.
>> > 
>> > Well, let me start saying that I may have failed in the doodle thing,
>> > but I still am dropping the email with what I heard as a feedback and
>> > what I would like to suggest.
>> > 
>> > I got the feedback, from more than one person, that the time for the
>> > community use cases meeting is not exactly optimal for everyone, and
>> > that is right.  For instance, it may be too early for folks in some
>> > parts of the US, while it is still too late for folks in Australia.
>> > 
>> > With this in mind, I would like to ask whether there is the interest
>> > to split the meeting, allowing then the involved parts to talk to each
>> > other in a time that suits them best.
>> > 
>> > So, this message is for everyone, but here I am explicitly looking for
>> > feedback from folks interested in:
>> > * K8S CI/CD pipeline with kata containers
>> >    - Here we have people interested from the US and Australia, so maybe
>> > a late meeting in the US time zone would benefit the folks in
>> > Australia.
>> > * Performance isolation
>> >    - Here we have people interested from the US and China, so maybe a
>> > late meeting in the US time zone would benefit the folks in China.
>> > 
>> > If the parts involved in this have the interest to do so, let me know
>> > and then I will try to organise a doodle, set an official time, etc,
>> > etc, etc.
>> > 
>> > We, as the community facilitating this communication, are here to
>> > facilitate the communication in a way that it will be beneficial for
>> > all the involved parts.
>> > 
>> > Best Regards,
>> > 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Into something rich and strange.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> kata-dev mailing list
>> kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io
>> http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev
> _______________________________________________
> kata-dev mailing list
> kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io
> http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.katacontainers.io/pipermail/kata-dev/attachments/20210407/897f7eb1/attachment.html>