Open Stack

Bob,

Thanks for the feedback and the link. At this time we're leaving the new
wording to the individual projects vs saying all OSF projects must use Y
instead of X. In part it's because projects have found that words have
different meanings in the context of where they're located within their
code, at least in the case of blacklist/whitelist. Ultimately we're hoping
to have a list of suggested replacements but realize what may work for one
project may not for another.

Thanks again!

Amy Marrich (spotz)

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 5:09 PM Monkman, Bob <bob.monkman at intel.com> wrote:

> Amy, et al,
>
>                Thanks for sharing this and I think Draft 5 seems like a
> good statement to build from. I am working on a Linux Foundation Networking
> (LFN)   task force looking at this issue for the projects under that
> umbrella.
>
>                As a part of that process, on our wiki page for this task
> force, we have compiled some links and a table of example recommended
> replacement terms that could be of interest to your OSF work as well.
>
>                Please see this reference at
> https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/display/LN/Inclusive+Language+Initiative
>
>                If this is of interest.
>
>  Best regards,
>
> Bob Monkman
>
> LFN Contributor, Strategic Planning Committee member, Marketing Chair
> CNTT/OPNFV
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Amy Marrich <amy at demarco.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, September 21, 2020 11:36 AM
> *To:* starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io;
> airship-discuss at lists.airshipit.org; kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io;
> zuul-discuss at lists.zuul-ci.org; openstack-discuss <
> openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org>; foundation at lists.openstack.org
> *Subject:* [Airship-discuss] [Diversity] Community feedback on Divisive
> Language stance
>
>
>
> The OSF Diversity & Inclusion WG has been working on creating the OSF's
> stance concerning divisive language. We will be holding one more meeting
> before sending the stance to the OSF Board for any changes before bringing
> it back to the Community.
>
>
>
> Our goal however is to get your input now to reduce any concerns in the
> future! Please check out Draft 4 on the etherpad[0] and place your comments
> there and join us on October 5th (meeting information will be sent out
> closer to the meeting)
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Amy (spotz)
>
> 0 - https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/divisivelanguage
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.katacontainers.io/pipermail/kata-dev/attachments/20200929/e1085b23/attachment.html>