Open Stack

Hey James,


My apologies for that, but my local network loop is presently undergoing some heavy-duty refactoring (I suspect related to deploying FTTH around here). As a result, I have some trouble performing even the most basic reviews.

Would you mind adding me to the rota for next week? Don't remove me this week, I'll try to see if I can still find times where the network works a little. But I would feel bad if the review rate remains close to what it is at present.

> ping github.com
PING github.com (140.82.121.3): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 140.82.121.3: icmp_seq=0 ttl=58 time=598.136 ms
64 bytes from 140.82.121.3: icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=687.521 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 2
Request timeout for icmp_seq 3
Request timeout for icmp_seq 4
Request timeout for icmp_seq 5
64 bytes from 140.82.121.3: icmp_seq=6 ttl=58 time=374.334 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 7
Request timeout for icmp_seq 8
64 bytes from 140.82.121.3: icmp_seq=9 ttl=58 time=753.328 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 10
Request timeout for icmp_seq 11
Request timeout for icmp_seq 12
64 bytes from 140.82.121.3: icmp_seq=13 ttl=58 time=480.540 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 14
Request timeout for icmp_seq 15
Request timeout for icmp_seq 16
Request timeout for icmp_seq 17
64 bytes from 140.82.121.3: icmp_seq=18 ttl=58 time=644.145 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 19
Request timeout for icmp_seq 20
64 bytes from 140.82.121.3: icmp_seq=21 ttl=58 time=420.318 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 22
Request timeout for icmp_seq 23
Request timeout for icmp_seq 24
Request timeout for icmp_seq 25
^C
--- github.com ping statistics ---
27 packets transmitted, 7 packets received, 74.1% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 374.334/565.475/753.328/132.157 ms

(no, this is not from a cell phone :-) 


Thanks
Christophe

> On 7 Dec 2020, at 09:40, Hunt, James O <james.o.hunt at intel.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> This week's Kata PR and issue herders are:
> 
> 
> - Chelsea (https://github.com/cmaf)
> - Christophe (https://github.com/c3d)
> - Julio (https://github.com/devimc)
> - Me (https://github.com/jodh-intel)
> - Ricardo (https://github.com/raravena80)
> 
> 
> # Statistics
> 
> ## Issues
> 
> Issues opened last week: 26
> Issues closed last week: 22
> Open issues: 1097
> Issue backlog project board: https://github.com/orgs/kata-containers/projects/23
> 
> ## PRs
> 
> PRs opened last week: 19
> PRs closed last week: 23
> Open PRs: 125
> Open PRs (excluding dnm+wip): 90
> 
> 
> # Get involved
> 
> If you'd like to help get the open PRs merged and open issues resolved (or get involved in other ways with Kata), take a look at the contributing guide [2] and the rota process [3]. Any problems, just ask us [4].
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> James
> 
> [1] - https://github.com/kata-containers/community/wiki/Review-Team-Rota
> [2] - https://github.com/kata-containers/community/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md
> [3] - https://github.com/kata-containers/community/blob/master/Rota-Process.md
> [4] - https://github.com/kata-containers/community/blob/master/README.md#join-us
> 
> ---
> https://katacontainers.io/ | https://github.com/kata-containers
> Open Source Technology Center
> Intel Corporation (UK) Ltd. - Co. Reg. #1134945 - Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Corporation (UK) Limited
> Registered No. 1134945 (England)
> Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ
> VAT No: 860 2173 47
> 
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kata-dev mailing list
> kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io
> http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev