* Montes, Julio (julio.montes at intel.com) wrote: > Hi kata-folks > > One of the topics in today's agent was QEMU 4 and the work that we are doing to support it in Kata Containers. > I ran the boot time and memory footprint metrics in my workstation to compare QEMU 4 vs QEMU-lite (2.11). > Here the results. > > Feel free to comment and raise your concerns about QEMU 4. So that looks pretty nice for QEMU 4; at least as fast and in the noise on the memory usage? Do you have any notes on how you configured and built the qemu 4 ? Dave > > > [cid:0167e7dca7f28c0cac1fcbc4b25a97cfeec1de1a.camel at intel.com] > > > [cid:78029be0c3d799ae75a605b679187f4b84a38ae2.camel at intel.com] > _______________________________________________ > kata-dev mailing list > kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io > http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert at redhat.com / Manchester, UK