Open Stack

Nice work folks! I'm looking forward to seeing it as the default kata
storage solution some day.

Also I'm wondering if there is interest in merging it in kata's qemu repo
(which is mainly qemu-lite and is the default hypervisor shipped by kata
packages). That would mean much wider user exposure. Of course it also
depends on how stable we think virtio-fs 1.0 is. Anyway, NEMU is already a
great step forward.

Cheers,
Tao

Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at redhat.com> 于 2019年3月8日周五 22:44写道：

> On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 02:22:23PM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> > Hi Stefan,
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 10:44:56AM +0000, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > virtio-fs is approaching a 1.0 release where it will be suitable for
> > > wider usage.  Sebastien has also gotten virtio-fs working with
> > > Firecracker so that both Kata VMMs can support it.
> > >
> > > Is there interest in merging virtio-fs 1.0 Linux and QEMU into Kata's
> > > repositories?
> > There is a strong interest, yes.
> > I am wondering if we should enable virtio-fs first in NEMU (Which we
> > support with Kata) to allow for an easy preview of virtio-fs and then
> > switch to the latest QEMU once virtio-fs support lands upstream.
>
> Nice, the QEMU commits should merge into NEMU pretty easily.
>
> virtio-fs consists of the vhost-user-fs-pci device in
> hw/virtio/vhost-user-fs.c and the file system daemon in
> contrib/virtiofsd/.
>
> I will send a follow-up when virtio-fs 1.0 is available.
>
> Thanks,
> Stefan
> _______________________________________________
> kata-dev mailing list
> kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io
> http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.katacontainers.io/pipermail/kata-dev/attachments/20190308/5c04a99a/attachment.html>