Open Stack

* Castelino, Manohar R (manohar.r.castelino at intel.com) wrote:
> > > Yes! That's exactly what it is.
> > Thanks for confirming! It's a brilliant idea IMO and a truly native solution to
> > the host fs sharing problem. Since it's based on FUSE, I suppose we can get
> > better POSIX compliance than 9pfs. And I don't think it requires any host
> > kernel change, right?
> 
> Do we really get better POSIX compliance?  From what I read I think we will still have some POSIX issues.

Which ones are you worried about?

Dave

--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert at redhat.com / Manchester, UK