[kata-dev] [AC][Election] Questions

Ricardo Aravena raravena80 at gmail.com
Mon Sep 3 16:52:56 UTC 2018


Thanks, @Wei, more than exact answers the idea to is help start discussions
:-)

On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 8:32 AM zhangwei (CR) <zhangwei555 at huawei.com> wrote:

> Hi Ricardo,
>
>
>
> A quick but late response,  your questions are mostly related to detailed
> technique, so I can’t give you a certain answer because some answers from
> me could be controversial and requires more discussion from more developers
> in community.
>
> So please take my answer as a reference,  but it may not be final solution.
>
>
>
> 1)  I believe this came up before, but what are the plans to tie docker
> or kubernetes container resource definitions/utilization to the specific
> resources running in QEMU. For example, if in kubernetes we specify that
> our container needs 2Gib of RAM how are we going to tie it into the Kata
> configuration. Is that going to work seamlessly with hotplug?  Are there
> any plans to work with the Kubernetes/Docker communities to make this work
> seamlessly?
>
>
>
> Wei: We have open issue:
> https://github.com/kata-containers/runtime/issues/400 , and PR work in
> progress: https://github.com/kata-containers/runtime/pull/580 , we can
> get resource requirement from container config from bundle, then hotplug
> resources(ie Memory) to existing VM. This is achievable even without help
> from docker/K8S communities.
>
>
>
> 2) Looks like the focus in the upcoming year is to make Kata more stable,
> scalable, adopted, etc. Part of getting more adoption is to support other
> Hypervisors, so how soon (priority wise) do you see support for other
> hypervisors like Hyper-V, and Xen? Which one would be next to support?
>
>
>
> Wei: I think it depends. If we have many many users want to run it on
> Windows, then Hyper-V could be next, same to Xen support. All depend on
> user/customer requirements.
>
>
>
> 2)  It looks like there are vulnerabilities that also affect VMs, such as
> the L1 Terminal Fault (L1TF). In terms of addressing are there any plans
> for mitigating these besides what the Hypervisors or VM runtimes (KVM, Xen,
> etc) might provide?
>
>
>
> Wei: we have a  Vulnerability Management Team handling volnerabilities
> report (https://github.com/kata-containers/community/pull/39), anyone can
> send email to VMT members to report an security issue he/she found.
> VM/Kernel CVE patches will be back ported periodly, besides we will add
> more security mechanism(e.g. Namespace, Cgroup, Seccomp etc.) to protect
> workload and platform.
>
>
>
> 4) Are there any plans to add support to make easy for cluster
> operators/server admins to debug the VM?  I mean we can always attach to
> the serial port but would be nice to have some tools to make it easy to
> debug.
>
>
>
> Wei: A tool is a good idea, here we need your issue or PR! J Recently
> James(@jodh-intel) add a new feature (opentracing support) for better trace
> logs for kata-containers, I think it can also help debug whole stack. But
> anyway, this is a big topic, and will need more works. Also, any suggestion
> is welcome!
>
>
>
> Thanks @Ricardo ,  not sure if this answers a bit of your questions.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
> -Wei
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *发件人:* Ricardo Aravena [mailto:raravena80 at gmail.com]
> *发送时间:* 2018年9月3日 7:22
> *收件人:* kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io
> *主题:* [kata-dev] [AC][Election] Questions
>
>
>
>
>
> Questions, (some of them came up in my talk at the OSS)
>
>
>
> 1) I believe this came up before, but what are the plans to tie docker or
> kubernetes container resource definitions/utilization to the specific
> resources running in QEMU. For example, if in kubernetes we specify that
> our container needs 2Gib of RAM how are we going to tie it into the Kata
> configuration. Is that going to work seamlessly with hotplug?  Are there
> any plans to work with the Kubernetes/Docker communities to make this work
> seamlessly?
>
>
>
> 2) Looks like the focus in the upcoming year is to make Kata more stable,
> scalable, adopted, etc. Part of getting more adoption is to support other
> Hypervisors, so how soon (priority wise) do you see support for other
> hypervisors like Hyper-V, and Xen? Which one would be next to support?
>
>
>
> 3) It looks like there are vulnerabilities that also affect VMs, such as
> the L1 Terminal Fault (L1TF). In terms of addressing are there any plans
> for mitigating these besides what the Hypervisors or VM runtimes (KVM, Xen,
> etc) might provide?
>
>
>
> 4) Are there any plans to add support to make easy for cluster
> operators/server admins to debug the VM?  I mean we can always attach to
> the serial port but would be nice to have some tools to make it easy to
> debug.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.katacontainers.io/pipermail/kata-dev/attachments/20180903/43f849e9/attachment.html>


More information about the kata-dev mailing list