Open Stack

Hi Graham,

It's a good idea. However whichever way I look at that, we end up with a
somewhat unwieldy table; either the table is super wide (one column per
user) or we end up having to use html fragments to convince gfm to allow
multi-line cells (for >1 user with a particular interest).

As such -- unless you want to have a stab at reformatting it? -- I'll leave
the format as-is as the current format is easy to maintain. Users can of
course use their browser search to find particular keywords but we should
probably keep an eye on the page to ensure we're consistent in our use of
the keywords.

Cheers,

James.

2018-08-28 18:58 GMT+01:00 Whaley, Graham <graham.whaley at intel.com>:

> Thanks for putting this together James. This is probably going to work
> better than having a MAINTAINERS file per repo that is auto-checked against
> the pullapprove config/github group members – as we have a number of
> members who are more ‘admin’ and less active, so that would cause some
> confusion…
>
>
>
> I have one high level suggestion, which I suspect you considered already –
> to me, I think it might be easier to navigate the table if the rows were
> the topics (VM, kernel, network etc.), rather than users. That way the PR
> submitter/reviewer/herder could go straight to one or two rows and pick
> folks out, rather than having to read every entry to find the interested
> parties.
>
>
>
> Wdyt?
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Hunt, James O [mailto:james.o.hunt at intel.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 28, 2018 6:03 PM
> *To:* kata-dev at lists.katacontainers.io
> *Subject:* [kata-dev] Users and their areas of interest
>
>
>
> I've put together a rough table showing some of the users and their areas
> of interest / specialist areas:
>
>
>
> https://github.com/kata-containers/community/wiki/Areas-of-interest
>
>
>
> This page could be useful for those raising PRs as they can look over the
> table and then add a few folk as explicit reviewers. It could also be
> useful for the weeks Kool Kats [1] to, again, manually add explicit
> reviewers for those PRs without much activity
>
>
>
> If I've offended you by either missing you out mis-specifying your
> interests, I humbly apologise [2].
>
>
>
> It's a first cut so there are bound to be mistakes - feel free to update
> it [3] :)
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> James.
>
>
>
> [1] - https://github.com/kata-containers/community/wiki/Review-Team-Rota
>
> [2] - If the spelling of that word offends you, I humbly apologize.
>
> [3] - But if you don't have privs, please let us know and we'll fix it:
> https://github.com/kata-containers/community#join-us
>
>
>
> ---
>
> https://katacontainers.io/ | https://github.com/kata-containers
> <https://github.com/clearcontainers>
>
> Open Source Technology Center
> Intel Corporation (UK) Ltd. - Co. Reg. #1134945 - Pipers Way, Swindon SN3
> 1RJ.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Corporation (UK) Limited
> Registered No. 1134945 (England)
> Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ
> VAT No: 860 2173 47
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>



-- 
James
---
https://katacontainers.io/ | https://github.com/kata-containers
<https://github.com/clearcontainers>
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation (UK) Ltd. - Co. Reg. #1134945 - Pipers Way, Swindon SN3
1RJ.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.katacontainers.io/pipermail/kata-dev/attachments/20180829/a242caf0/attachment.html>