Xu, you have input on KSM usage? Yuntong?

--Eric

On 7/17/19, 10:23 AM, "Montes, Julio" julio.montes@intel.com wrote:

Hi Kata-folks

I have raised a pull request to enable some security features in the guest kernel https://github.com/kata-containers/packaging/pull/639 . This change will impact in the memory consumption because of the kernel memory randomization. In the case of no-KSM the difference is ~2MB and I think it's a price that we can pay. But for KSM the difference is ~36MB. I would like to know what do you think about this change.

Is KSM a feature that should be still considered?

Do you have enabled KSM in your cluster?

Thanks

-- Julio

_______________________________________________ kata-dev mailing list kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev