[RFC]: Kata tracing proposals
Hi All, TL;DR Please review the tracing proposals document PR [1]. # Detail Hot on the heels of the last tracing update [2], I've just raised a doc PR that summarises liubin's proposals for tracing with Kata [1]. In summary, the proposals simplify the planned architecture still further, but remove "dynamic tracing" from our plans (although this could be considered at a later date if the community deems it worthwhile). # Feedback required If you have an interest in tracing, _please_ review this document and comment. We're particularly keen to understand the answers to the questions listed on the PR above (do you care more about short-lived or long-running containers, etc). The answers will help us decide whether to proceed with the proposals. # Architecture Committee discussion I've added an agenda item for next weeks AC meeting [3] to discuss these proposals so you have a few days to review the doc before we discuss next Tuesday. Cheers, James [1] - https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/pull/2062 [2] - https://gist.github.com/jodh-intel/0ee54d41d2a803ba761e166136b42277 [3] - https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/Kata_Containers_2021_Architecture_Committee_M... --- https://katacontainers.io/ | https://github.com/kata-containers Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation (UK) Ltd. - Co. Reg. #1134945 - Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ.
Hi All, I've written up a brief summary of what was discussed in the AC meetings on this topic [1]. No concerns were raised about the agent tracing proposals and since it's been almost two weeks since my last mail on this topic, we'll continue with these proposals. However, we need more detail on the trace forwarder proposals (or a PR so we can get a better understanding of the benefits). Cheers, James [1] - https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/pull/2062 --- https://katacontainers.io/ | https://github.com/kata-containers Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation (UK) Ltd. - Co. Reg. #1134945 - Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ. ________________________________________ De : Hunt, James O <james.o.hunt@intel.com> Envoyé : vendredi 18 juin 2021 09:57 À : kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io Objet : [RFC]: Kata tracing proposals Hi All, TL;DR Please review the tracing proposals document PR [1]. # Detail Hot on the heels of the last tracing update [2], I've just raised a doc PR that summarises liubin's proposals for tracing with Kata [1]. In summary, the proposals simplify the planned architecture still further, but remove "dynamic tracing" from our plans (although this could be considered at a later date if the community deems it worthwhile). # Feedback required If you have an interest in tracing, _please_ review this document and comment. We're particularly keen to understand the answers to the questions listed on the PR above (do you care more about short-lived or long-running containers, etc). The answers will help us decide whether to proceed with the proposals. # Architecture Committee discussion I've added an agenda item for next weeks AC meeting [3] to discuss these proposals so you have a few days to review the doc before we discuss next Tuesday. Cheers, James [1] - https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/pull/2062 [2] - https://gist.github.com/jodh-intel/0ee54d41d2a803ba761e166136b42277 [3] - https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/Kata_Containers_2021_Architecture_Committee_M... --- https://katacontainers.io/ | https://github.com/kata-containers Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation (UK) Ltd. - Co. Reg. #1134945 - Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ.
participants (1)
-
Hunt, James O