On 31 Aug 2021, at 12:31, David Gibson <kata-dev@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:

On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 09:23:04AM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 5:16 AM David Gibson
<kata-dev@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:

On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 01:24:20PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
David,

Then we will have an one not small patch removing the govmm vendor.

So, I'd be happy enough with this approach if we could incrementally
introduce the new interface then drop govmm once the new interface
covers everything.

Unfortunately, that doesn't really work, because govmm owns the qmp
interface and the qemu command line, so we can't build a new interface
"bottom up".

While we are at it, should we rename "govmm" to something that indicates

it's really specific to qemu? Or do we want to take the opposite route

(which was evoked yesterday) to move to VMM the "hypervisor" abstraction

that we have in Kata?

--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
_______________________________________________
kata-dev mailing list
kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io
http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev