Hi,
I mentioned at
next meeting presenting the work and ideas which we have been trying out
for s390x around the image pull challenges and future ideas.
With holidays
in China for our main presenter and KubeCon next week I hope it will be
OK for us to present this and some ideas for possible extensions to shim
api etc the following week?
So Thursday 13th
May.
Thanks
James
Magowan
IBM
Hyper Protect Containers (ZaaS Kubernetes) |
|
Mobile:
44-7808-247946 | Phone:
44-1962-817235
E-mail:
MAGOWAN@uk.ibm.com
|
Hursley Park
Hursley,
Hampshire SO212JN
United
Kingdom |
IBM
United Kingdom Limited
Registered
in England and Wales with number 741598
Registered
office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 3AU
From:
Samuel
Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
To:
Ariel
Adam <aadam@redhat.com>, kata-dev <kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io>
Cc:
Peng
Tao <bergwolf@antfin.com>
Date:
29/04/2021
15:41
Subject:
[EXTERNAL]
Re: [kata-dev] Community use cases meeting
Thanks everyone for joining today's
meeting, very interesting
discussions.
Please note that we decided to move to a weekly cadence, we have a lot
to talk about it seems.
Below you will find the meeting minutes, extracted from the rolling
meeting notes document [1]
* Current set of pull requests related to enablement (3 PRs)
- How do we want to proceed with those PRs?
- Samuel thinks that merging the TDX could help overall (a few more
comments to request). The idea would be to rebase the 2 others
on top of
this one. Any objections?
- We agree to merge the framework first and pile the other patches
on top
of it :-)
* Agent API - discussion on what API restrictions we need (build time option
or not)
- What is the risk of having this code in the image however just
not used?
- It could be a runtime configuration for the agent however still
part of
the image (inside the initrd)
- We may have benefits from restricting the APIs (reducing attack
surface)
- Could we limit things to always getting all the pod configuration
at
once (and nothing else?)
- So the idea would be to drop those APIs for all use cases
* Container image service offload
- PEV raksh codebase -> https://github.com/IBM/raksh-agent/commit/14b52fae8c7bc3ce4b226703efdb37749ce84fe9
* Testing for confidential computing - and general expectations
- A big question regarding how to test the different platform so
it’s
something accessible upstream (SEV and TDX)
- Intel will provide HW for testing as part of the kata CI
- Can AMD also provide HW for the kata CI?
- Sandeep pointed out they have the HW for this however the question
is
how to make the HW available for kata CI testing
- What tests would we want to run in this case?
- Samuel will pull Salvador to look into this
- We may start by looking at the integration tests and later on
E2E
integration with k8s
* Action Items
- Ariel to change the name of the meeting to confidential computing
- Ariel to change the meeting cadence to a weekly one
- Samuel to send a doodle to poll for meeting time changes
[1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1E3GLCzNgrcigUlgWAZYlgqNTdVwiMwCRTJ0QnJhLZGA/edit?usp=sharing
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 11:23:23PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> All,
>
> A friendly reminder that we will have our weekly use case meeting
> tomorrow (04/29) at 12:00 UTC. See you all tomorrow!
>
> Cheers,
> Samuel.
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 08:12:34PM +0300, Ariel Adam wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 2:25 PM James Magowan <MAGOWAN@uk.ibm.com>
wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Ariel/Samuel,
> > >
> > > Moving Confidential computing Use Case meeting is fine for
me.
> > >
> > > Given recent fun with summer savings time and the dates/times
in the
> > > thread.
> > >
> > > Can we clarify that meetings will be?
> > > every 2 weeks at 12:00 UTC
> > > https://zoom.us/j/98038141932
> > > next meetings Thursday 29th April, Thursday 13th May etc.
> > >
> > >
> > I've moved the meeting 1 week forward to April the 29th and verified
that
> > the only invitee is kata-dev mailing list.
> >
> > The meeting will be at 12:00 UTC and happen every 2 weeks.
> > I will also make sure to send a reminder a day before the meeting
(every 2
> > weeks).
> >
> > Lastly, I'm reminding everyone that this time slot is mainly
for the
> > confidential computing use case and the CI/CD and performance
use cases
> > will be discussed at other times.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > James
> > > *Mobile:* 44-7808-247946 | *Phone:* 44-1962-817235
> > >
> > > *E-mail:* *MAGOWAN@uk.ibm.com* <MAGOWAN@uk.ibm.com>
> > > Hursley Park
> > >
> > > Hursley, Hampshire SO212JN
> > >
> > > United Kingdom
> > >
> > > IBM United Kingdom Limited
> > >
> > > Registered in England and Wales with number 741598
> > >
> > > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth,
Hants. PO6 3AU
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Ariel Adam <aadam@redhat.com>
> > > To: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
Eric Ernst <
> > > eric.g.ernst@gmail.com>, Peng Tao <bergwolf@antfin.com>,
kata-dev <
> > > kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io>
> > > Date: 18/04/2021 18:42
> > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [kata-dev]
Community use cases meeting
> > > ------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Since you're leading the confidential computing use case
which we agreed
> > > Thursday's time slot would be used for then to me that makes
sense.
> > >
> > > Does anyone object to moving the meeting by 1 week (as usual
every 2 weeks
> > > from there)?
> > >
> > > Also, a few people pointed out that they don't see the meeting
or still
> > > see it every 2 weeks instead of 1 week. We basically sent
an invite to the
> > > kata-dev for every 2 weeks so if anyone has a better idea
on how to do that
> > > please let us know :-).
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 8:32 PM Samuel Ortiz <*sameo@linux.intel.com*
> > > <sameo@linux.intel.com>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ariel,
> > >
> > > Next week's meeting (04/21), I will be out of the office
and won't be
> > > able to attend the meeting. Would anyone object if we shift
that one to
> > > 04/28 instead ?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Samuel.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 01:27:54PM +0300, Ariel Adam wrote:
> > > > Hi everyone.
> > > > Going back to this mail thread.
> > > > Talking with Samuel it will be hard for him to move
the time slot for the
> > > > confidential computing use case (currently on Thursday
every 2 weeks 8AM
> > > > EST).
> > > >
> > > > What we suggest is the following:
> > > >
> > > > - *Confidential computing* - will keep
the current timeslot, please
> > > ping
> > > > Samuel directly if you would like to attend
and this is a problem for
> > > you
> > > > - *CI/CD use case* - in practice it's
only RH and IBM cloud thus we
> > > will
> > > > work mainly through mails (and ping me
if you are also interested in
> > > this)
> > > > - *Performance isolation* - Tao will work
on a different time slot to
> > > > fit people who would like to attend as
well (such as Eric)
> > > >
> > > > As pointed, we will ask to provide a status on the
use cases progress
> > > > during the AC meetings if time permits.
> > > >
> > > > Comments are welcomed.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 5:08 PM Eric Ernst <*eric.g.ernst@gmail.com*
> > > <eric.g.ernst@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Makes sense to me, and I appreciate the change!
> > > > >
> > > > > Eric
> > > > >
> > > > > On Apr 7, 2021, at 6:26 AM, Ariel Adam <*aadam@redhat.com*
> > > <aadam@redhat.com>> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Given that Tao agrees this makes sense I checked
with Samuel as well.
> > > > >
> > > > > What we suggest is that each use case leads (Ariel,
Samuel, Tao) will
> > > send
> > > > > a separate doodle poll for their use case.
> > > > > That way each of the use case teams can decide
on a time that fits the
> > > > > majority of participants and also on the cadence
of the meetings
> > > (every 1
> > > > > or 2 weeks).
> > > > >
> > > > > We will also propose to give a short update on
the progress of the
> > > > > different use cases on the weekly AC meeting (if
time permits).
> > > > >
> > > > > Let us know if anyone has any objections before
we send out the doodle
> > > > > polls.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 3:03 PM Peng Tao via kata-dev
<
> > > > > *kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io* <kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io>>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Thanks for bringing it to the list Fabiano!
I am interested in the
> > > > >> performance isolation use case and would love
to see US folks present
> > > > >> their thoughts and ideas too. So I am all
for it to split the use case
> > > > >> meeting and relocate to a time that works
better for US folks.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Cheers,
> > > > >> Tao
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On 2021/4/7 16:26, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > > > >> > Yesterday, Apr 6th, during the Architecture
Committee meeting, we
> > > > >> > discussed the possibility of having the
community use cases meeting
> > > > >> > split, and I assigned myself the action
item to create a doodle and
> > > > >> > send an email.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Well, let me start saying that I may
have failed in the doodle
> > > thing,
> > > > >> > but I still am dropping the email with
what I heard as a feedback
> > > and
> > > > >> > what I would like to suggest.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I got the feedback, from more than one
person, that the time for the
> > > > >> > community use cases meeting is not exactly
optimal for everyone, and
> > > > >> > that is right. For instance, it
may be too early for folks in some
> > > > >> > parts of the US, while it is still too
late for folks in Australia.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > With this in mind, I would like to ask
whether there is the interest
> > > > >> > to split the meeting, allowing then the
involved parts to talk to
> > > each
> > > > >> > other in a time that suits them best.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > So, this message is for everyone, but
here I am explicitly looking
> > > for
> > > > >> > feedback from folks interested in:
> > > > >> > * K8S CI/CD pipeline with kata containers
> > > > >> > - Here we have people interested
from the US and Australia, so
> > > maybe
> > > > >> > a late meeting in the US time zone would
benefit the folks in
> > > > >> > Australia.
> > > > >> > * Performance isolation
> > > > >> > - Here we have people interested
from the US and China, so maybe
> > > a
> > > > >> > late meeting in the US time zone would
benefit the folks in China.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > If the parts involved in this have the
interest to do so, let me
> > > know
> > > > >> > and then I will try to organise a doodle,
set an official time, etc,
> > > > >> > etc, etc.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > We, as the community facilitating this
communication, are here to
> > > > >> > facilitate the communication in a way
that it will be beneficial for
> > > > >> > all the involved parts.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Best Regards,
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> Into something rich and strange.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > > >> kata-dev mailing list
> > > > >> *kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io* <kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io>
> > > > >> *http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev*
> > > <http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev
>
> > > > >>
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > kata-dev mailing list
> > > > > *kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io* <kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io>
> > > > > *http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev*
> > > <http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev
>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > kata-dev mailing list
> > > > *kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io* <kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io>
> > > > *http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev*
> > > <http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev
>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > kata-dev mailing list
> > > kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io
> > > http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Unless stated otherwise above:
> > > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales
with number
> > > 741598.
> > > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth,
Hampshire PO6 3AU
> > >
>
> _______________________________________________
> kata-dev mailing list
> kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io
> http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev
_______________________________________________
kata-dev mailing list
kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io
http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU