Nice work folks! I'm looking forward to seeing it as the default kata storage solution some day.

Also I'm wondering if there is interest in merging it in kata's qemu repo (which is mainly qemu-lite and is the default hypervisor shipped by kata packages). That would mean much wider user exposure. Of course it also depends on how stable we think virtio-fs 1.0 is. Anyway, NEMU is already a great step forward.

Cheers,
Tao

Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> 于 2019年3月8日周五 22:44写道:
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 02:22:23PM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 10:44:56AM +0000, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > virtio-fs is approaching a 1.0 release where it will be suitable for
> > wider usage.  Sebastien has also gotten virtio-fs working with
> > Firecracker so that both Kata VMMs can support it.
> >
> > Is there interest in merging virtio-fs 1.0 Linux and QEMU into Kata's
> > repositories?
> There is a strong interest, yes.
> I am wondering if we should enable virtio-fs first in NEMU (Which we
> support with Kata) to allow for an easy preview of virtio-fs and then
> switch to the latest QEMU once virtio-fs support lands upstream.

Nice, the QEMU commits should merge into NEMU pretty easily.

virtio-fs consists of the vhost-user-fs-pci device in
hw/virtio/vhost-user-fs.c and the file system daemon in
contrib/virtiofsd/.

I will send a follow-up when virtio-fs 1.0 is available.

Thanks,
Stefan
_______________________________________________
kata-dev mailing list
kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io
http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev