Could you add me to the reviewer rota for EMEA?
Thanks! And done:
Aside: I've also swapped Penny with Jianyong Wu after Penny's recent post, but feel free to update the wiki if you'd like Penny/Jianyong!
> 3.1) Consider re-enabling the stalebot [3.1] trigger [3.2] that used to auto-close issues that hadn't seen activity for a long time [3.3].
Could we mark them with a "stale" label rather than auto-close?
Often, really old stuff is still relevant. It takes a human reviewer to determine if it's for example a bug that nobody reproduced, in which case auto-close makes sense, or a feature that nobody implemented, but that we all see as useful, in which case auto-close is counter-productive.
I like this idea. We already have a stale label and we can just tweak the stalebot config to specify "daysUntilClose = flase" to only add the "stale" label.
> 6) Consider creating a Kanban board for the PR backlog to make that easier to manage too.
Do you think it's possible to also move the original issue to a "PR" state?
I'm not sure I follow what you mean here?
> If you'd like to get involved in any of the above (particularly the actual reviewing of issues), again, please let us know ;-)
I will try to spend a bit more time on reviewing. These tools help.
Thanks very much Christophe! ;)
Cheers,
James