* Montes, Julio (julio.montes@intel.com) wrote:
On Tue, 2019-05-28 at 18:19 +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
* Montes, Julio (julio.montes@intel.com) wrote:
Hi kata-folks
One of the topics in today's agent was QEMU 4 and the work that we are doing to support it in Kata Containers. I ran the boot time and memory footprint metrics in my workstation to compare QEMU 4 vs QEMU-lite (2.11). Here the results.
Feel free to comment and raise your concerns about QEMU 4.
So that looks pretty nice for QEMU 4; at least as fast and in the noise on the memory usage?
yeah - IMO QEMU 4 has a good performance and new features, it's a good hypervisor for Kata Containers.
Great! Please keep running these tests to make sure we don't regress in future versions (especially on our soft-freezes etc so we can spot them before the next release.
Do you have any notes on how you configured and built the qemu 4 ?
Yes, we use this script [1] to build all QEMUs
[1] - https://github.com/kata-containers/packaging/blob/master/scripts/configure-h...
Thanks! Dave
Dave
[cid:0167e7dca7f28c0cac1fcbc4b25a97cfeec1de1a.camel@intel.com]
[cid:78029be0c3d799ae75a605b679187f4b84a38ae2.camel@intel.com]
_______________________________________________ kata-dev mailing list kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev
-- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK