That doesn't look too bad and not dissimilar to the new section I just added for repo "points of contact" on that page.
I don't understand why the hotlinks aren't working for you - I don't want to steal your thunder so feel free to replace the existing (first) table with what you've got there! (although I think your version is now out-of-sync with the latest table - see zSeries for example).
Cheers,
James
2018-08-29 15:40 GMT+01:00 Whaley, Graham graham.whaley@intel.com:
I had a quick stab. Annoyingly, although I got this to view in a draft edit of the existing page, I could not get it to render the user hotlinks in either a new page or a gist or a wiki on my local repo clone. Dunno why, but if you can figure that out or you can have a preview in a temporary edit of the existing page, then here is the (incomplete) example I knocked up.
If it works for you, let me know, and I’ll complete the table on the existing page.
--- paste hopefully in not-too-rich-text ---
| What | Who |
| ---- | --- |
| agent | [bergwolf][bergwolf] |
| anything | [bergwolf][bergwolf], [jodh-intel][jodh-intel] |
| ARM64 | |
| CI | [chavafg][chavafg], [GabyCT][GabyCT] |
| community | [annabellebertooch][annabellebertooch] |
| containerd | |
| CRIO | |
| cpu | [devimc][devimc] |
| documentations | [jodh-intel][jodh-intel] |
| guest os | |
| hotplug | [devimc][devimc] |
| hypervisors | |
| Integrations | |
| K8s | [chavafg][chavafg] |
| kernel | |
| logging | [jodh-intel][jodh-intel] |
| memory constraints | [devimc][devimc] |
| memory hotplug | |
| metrics | |
| middleware integration | |
| networking | [amshinde][amshinde] |
| orchestration | |
| packaging | |
| PPC64le | |
| process | [jodh-intel][jodh-intel] |
| qemu | |
| static analysis | [jodh-intel][jodh-intel] |
| storage | [amshinde][amshinde], [devimc][devimc] |
| tests | [chavafg][chavafg], [GabyCT][GabyCT] |
| tracing | [jodh-intel][jodh-intel] |
| zSeries | |
Graham
*From:* Hunt, James O [mailto:james.o.hunt@intel.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29, 2018 2:26 PM *To:* Whaley, Graham graham.whaley@intel.com *Cc:* kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io *Subject:* Re: [kata-dev] Users and their areas of interest
Hi Graham,
It's a good idea. However whichever way I look at that, we end up with a somewhat unwieldy table; either the table is super wide (one column per user) or we end up having to use html fragments to convince gfm to allow multi-line cells (for >1 user with a particular interest).
As such -- unless you want to have a stab at reformatting it? -- I'll leave the format as-is as the current format is easy to maintain. Users can of course use their browser search to find particular keywords but we should probably keep an eye on the page to ensure we're consistent in our use of the keywords.
Cheers,
James.
2018-08-28 18:58 GMT+01:00 Whaley, Graham graham.whaley@intel.com:
Thanks for putting this together James. This is probably going to work better than having a MAINTAINERS file per repo that is auto-checked against the pullapprove config/github group members – as we have a number of members who are more ‘admin’ and less active, so that would cause some confusion…
I have one high level suggestion, which I suspect you considered already – to me, I think it might be easier to navigate the table if the rows were the topics (VM, kernel, network etc.), rather than users. That way the PR submitter/reviewer/herder could go straight to one or two rows and pick folks out, rather than having to read every entry to find the interested parties.
Wdyt?
*From:* Hunt, James O [mailto:james.o.hunt@intel.com] *Sent:* Tuesday, August 28, 2018 6:03 PM *To:* kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io *Subject:* [kata-dev] Users and their areas of interest
I've put together a rough table showing some of the users and their areas of interest / specialist areas:
https://github.com/kata-containers/community/wiki/Areas-of-interest
This page could be useful for those raising PRs as they can look over the table and then add a few folk as explicit reviewers. It could also be useful for the weeks Kool Kats [1] to, again, manually add explicit reviewers for those PRs without much activity
If I've offended you by either missing you out mis-specifying your interests, I humbly apologise [2].
It's a first cut so there are bound to be mistakes - feel free to update it [3] :)
Cheers,
James.
[1] - https://github.com/kata-containers/community/wiki/Review-Team-Rota
[2] - If the spelling of that word offends you, I humbly apologize.
[3] - But if you don't have privs, please let us know and we'll fix it: https://github.com/kata-containers/community#join-us
https://katacontainers.io/ | https://github.com/kata-containers https://github.com/clearcontainers
Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation (UK) Ltd. - Co. Reg. #1134945 - Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ.
Intel Corporation (UK) Limited Registered No. 1134945 (England) Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ VAT No: 860 2173 47
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
--
James
https://katacontainers.io/ | https://github.com/kata-containers https://github.com/clearcontainers
Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation (UK) Ltd. - Co. Reg. #1134945 - Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ.
Intel Corporation (UK) Limited Registered No. 1134945 (England) Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ VAT No: 860 2173 47
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.