<html dir="ltr">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body style="text-align:left; direction:ltr;">
<div>+ Salvatore Mazzarino</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>+1  virtcontainers/pkg/qemu should be in sync with kata-containers/govmm repo</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>On Wed, 2021-07-28 at 22:45 +0800, bin liu wrote:</div>
<blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Hi all</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Moving the source into kata-containers repo and keeping the original golang package as a copy may be a good idea.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
Like the Kubernetes way: <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/tree/master/staging#using-staged-repositories-from-kubernetes-code">
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/tree/master/staging#using-staged-repositories-from-kubernetes-code</a>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>It will only need external work to sync the code. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">2021年7月28日(水) 16:28 Christophe de Dinechin <<a href="mailto:cdupontd@redhat.com">cdupontd@redhat.com</a>>:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
<br>
> On 28 Jul 2021, at 09:50, Fabiano Fidêncio <<a href="mailto:fabiano@fidencio.org" target="_blank">fabiano@fidencio.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> <br>
> Folks,<br>
> <br>
> David Gibson, in an internal conversation, raised Today the pain of<br>
> trying to fix a QEMU + kata-containers issue, having to update govmm,<br>
> get it reviewed & merged on the govmm side, and only then be able to<br>
> proceed with the work on QEMU + kata-containers.   I can relate to<br>
> that, I'm pretty sure other developers can relate to that as well.<br>
> <br>
> Considering that govmm is only used by kata-containers, wouldn't it be<br>
> the case to have it as part of the virt-containers package rather than<br>
> it's own project that we vendor?  I tend to see this as taking a step<br>
> towards how we integrate cloud-hypervisor with kata-containers.<br>
> <br>
> What do people think about this?  Is this a move we can make as part<br>
> of the 2.3 release cycle?  Or are there other users of govmm that we<br>
> missed?<br>
<br>
Even if that's the case, we can still keep some external repository<br>
in sync with the internal code, e.g. using git subtrees and exporting<br>
govmm "releases" for external consumers.<br>
<br>
> <br>
> Opinions, concerns, suggestions, all of those are super welcome.<br>
> <br>
> Best Regards,<br>
> -- <br>
> Fabiano Fidêncio<br>
> <br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> kata-dev mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io" target="_blank">kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">
http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev</a><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
kata-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io" target="_blank">kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<pre>_______________________________________________</pre>
<pre>kata-dev mailing list</pre>
<a href="mailto:kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io">
<pre>kata-dev@lists.katacontainers.io</pre>
</a>
<pre><br></pre>
<a href="http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev">
<pre>http://lists.katacontainers.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kata-dev</pre>
</a>
<pre><br></pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>